Competitor Teardown: Learn From the Enemy¶
Learn from the competition by tearing down 3 competitors (a leader, a fast riser and one that stalled) across positioning, store listing, onboarding, pricing and paywall, growth channels, ads, changelog and reviews, using free public tools, and turn it into a Copy / Beat / Avoid list. Use when about to build or reposition, when a competitor is growing faster, when planning pricing or a launch, or when someone asks "analyze my competitors", "competitor teardown", "what are competitors doing", "learn from competitors", or "why is X growing".
In 2–3 hours you will know what 3 competitors do at every step from first impression to payment, which of it works, and a short list of what to copy, where to beat them, and what to avoid.
Goal¶
Your competitors have already paid to test positioning, pricing, onboarding and channels. Study those results so you start from their lessons instead of repeating their experiments.
When to use¶
- Before building, repositioning or re-pricing.
- A competitor is suddenly growing, or suddenly quiet.
- Before a launch, to see where they launched and what worked.
- Not for: mining their reviews in depth → research-review-mining. Learning from successful products outside your niche → case-study-success-story-analysis.
Inputs¶
- 3 competitors: a leader (the one everyone mentions), a riser (newer and growing fast), and one that stalled (no updates in a year, falling ratings). Failures teach as much as winners.
- A test device or browser, and a throwaway email for sign-ups.
assets/teardown-sheet.mdfrom this skill.
What to look at (and the free tools)¶
| Area | Look at | Free tool / where |
|---|---|---|
| Positioning | Headline, first screenshot, who they say it's for, the one promise | Store page, homepage |
| Store listing | Title, subtitle, screenshot captions, rating and count, category rank | App Store / Google Play page |
| Shipping pace | What they released and how often, which tells you their priorities | App Store Version History, Play "What's new", public changelog |
| Onboarding | Steps to first value, sign-up wall, permissions, when the paywall appears | Install it and screenshot every screen |
| Pricing and paywall | Plans, trial, anchor price, past price changes | Paywall screens. Old versions of the pricing page on the Wayback Machine |
| Web traffic and channels | Rough traffic, top sources (search, social, referrals) | Similarweb (free tier), Google Trends for brand interest |
| Ads | Which ads they run, how long (long-running ads usually work) | Meta Ad Library, Google Ads Transparency Center, TikTok ad library (ads shown in Europe) |
| Launches and community | Where they launched, what people said | Product Hunt page, Show HN thread, their subreddit or Discord |
| Content and SEO | Blog topics, comparison pages ("X vs Y"), free tools | site:competitor.com searches |
| Tech stack | Analytics, payments, support tools | BuiltWith (web) |
| What users say | Top complaints and praise | Reviews → research-review-mining |
Steps¶
- Pick the 3 competitors (10 min) and write one line on why each one matters.
- Be a new user (20 min each). Search for the job your product does, find them, install, sign up and use the main feature. Screenshot every screen until you hit the paywall. Count the taps to first value.
- Fill the teardown sheet (20 min each) using the table above. Facts only, with a link or screenshot for each.
- Look for proof, not opinions. A pattern is worth copying if there's evidence it works: an ad running for 3+ months, a feature every competitor converged on, a paywall layout they kept after a redesign, praise in reviews.
- Write Copy / Beat / Avoid (20 min).
- Copy: proven patterns that users now expect (not their brand, words or assets).
- Beat: their weaknesses that users complain about and that you can fix.
- Avoid: what the stalled competitor did, and anything the others tried and removed.
- Pick 3 actions for this month and link them to skills (pricing, paywall, listing, launch).
- Repeat every quarter. Put the sheet in your research folder (research-doc-organization) and note what changed since last time.
Prompt (copy-paste)¶
Works best with web browsing. Replace everything in {{ }}. Paste your screenshots or notes if the AI can't browse.
You are a product strategist doing a competitor teardown for me.
My product: {{what it does, platform, price model, stage}}
Competitors: leader {{name + link}}, riser {{name + link}}, stalled {{name + link}}
My notes and screenshots from using them: {{paste}}
For each competitor, fill this table with facts and a source for each (link or "from my notes"):
positioning (headline, promise, audience) · store listing (title, subtitle, first 3 screenshot captions, rating + count) ·
shipping pace (last 5 releases from version history/changelog) · onboarding (steps to first value, sign-up wall, paywall timing) ·
pricing (plans, trial, anchor, any past changes) · channels (launches, ads that have run for a long time, content/SEO, communities) ·
top 3 complaints and top 3 praises from reviews.
Then write:
- COPY: 5 proven patterns worth adopting, with the evidence for each (not their brand or wording).
- BEAT: 5 weaknesses users complain about that I could fix, with evidence.
- AVOID: 3 mistakes, especially from the stalled competitor.
- 3 actions for this month.
Never invent numbers, dates or quotes. Write "unknown" when you can't verify something.
Example output¶
Illustrative example. Fictional products and findings, shown for format.
My product: Sipwell, a water reminder (iOS, freemium).
| Leader: AquaDaily | Riser: Sippy | Stalled: DrinkUp | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Promise | "Hit your water goal" | "Hydration for busy people" | "Track your water" |
| Taps to first value | 9 (account required) | 3 (no account) | 6 |
| Paywall | After onboarding, 7-day trial, yearly default | On 3rd reminder setup | Ads + $2.99 remove-ads |
| Ships | Every 2 weeks | Weekly, widget-focused | Last update 14 months ago |
| Long-running ad | "Stop forgetting to drink" UGC video (5 months) | — | — |
| Top complaint | Forced account | Too few themes | Crashes on iOS 26 |
- Copy: yearly plan as the default with a trial timeline; a UGC-style ad hook about forgetting to drink; widgets.
- Beat: no account needed (their #1 complaint); fewer steps to first value (target: 3 taps).
- Avoid: an ads-only model and slow updates (DrinkUp's ratings fell from 4.6 to 3.9).
Common mistakes¶
- Copying their brand, words or screenshots. Learn the pattern, and write your own version. Copying is unethical and can break store rules and trademarks.
- Only studying the leader. Their advantages (brand, budget) often aren't copyable. Risers and failures teach more.
- Opinions without evidence. "Their onboarding is bad" isn't useful. "9 taps and an account before first value, #1 complaint in 40 reviews" is.
- A teardown that changes nothing. End with 3 actions, or it was just reading.
Related skills¶
- research-review-mining: go deep on their reviews.
- case-study-success-story-analysis: learn from winners in other niches.
- monetization-pricing-strategy and monetization-paywall-design: act on what you found.
- aso-title-subtitle-optimization: position against them in search.
Credits¶
Written by @nvminhtu. Tool coverage and limits change (for example, the TikTok library covers ads shown in Europe), so check each tool's help page.